Legacy · Thermal validation

Infinite slab, four routes

Slab thickness L=1.0mL=1.0\,\mathrm{m}, T0=T∞=25∘CT_0=T_{\infty}=25\,^{\circ}\mathrm{C}, reading at x=L/2x=L/2. Four calculations with the homogeneous-interconversion material.

  1. FEM, adiabatic formulation, Ea/R=4000KE_a/R=4000\,\mathrm{K}.
  2. FEM, two-term isothermal formulation, the same Q(teq)Q(t_{eq}) as the homogeneous material.
  3. Particular curve TQ(t)T^{Q}(t) taken at the TmaxT_{\max} point, with Ea/R=0E_a/R=0.
  4. Analytical infinite-slab solution with that particular curve.

Paper: Analytical and numerical validation of the thermochemical problem of early-age concrete · DOI 10.70271/rirc.v1n2a008

Input data

Item Value
LL 1.0m1.0\,\mathrm{m}
Monitor point x=L/2x=L/2 (column 0,0.5 in the FEM histories)
T0=T∞T_0=T_{\infty} 25∘C25\,^{\circ}\mathrm{C}
TrefT_{\mathrm{ref}} 25∘C25\,^{\circ}\mathrm{C}
kk 9.36kJ/(m⋅h⋅∘C)9.36\,\mathrm{kJ/(m\cdot h\cdot^{\circ}C)}
ρ\rho 2300kg/m32300\,\mathrm{kg/m^3}
cec_e 0.900kJ/(kg⋅∘C)0.900\,\mathrm{kJ/(kg\cdot^{\circ}C)}
h2=k/(ρce)h^{2}=k/(\rho c_e) 4.52×10−3m2/h4.52\times 10^{-3}\,\mathrm{m^2/h}
CC 300kg/m3300\,\mathrm{kg/m^3}
Particular curve ΔT∞Q=30∘C\Delta T^{Q}_{\infty}=30\,^{\circ}\mathrm{C}, a=12.35ha=12.35\,\mathrm{h}, c=1.678c=1.678, Ea/R=0E_a/R=0
Fourier modes 1010 to 1515

The particular curve keeps the amplitude at 30∘C30\,^{\circ}\mathrm{C}. Parameters aa and cc absorb the history at the TmaxT_{\max} point and the lack of thermal activation in the analytical equation.

Reference result

Peak temperatures at mid-depth, read from the series on this page:

Route TmaxT_{\max} (°C)
Isothermal FEM 41.35
Adiabatic FEM 41.38
Analytical, particular curve 41.04

The report shows the four routes on the figure and does not publish an RMSE for this slab. Comparing the series on this page, the isothermal route against the analytical solution has RMSE 0.27∘C0.27\,^{\circ}\mathrm{C} (maximum absolute difference about 1.0∘C1.0\,^{\circ}\mathrm{C}). The adiabatic route has RMSE 0.27∘C0.27\,^{\circ}\mathrm{C} (maximum absolute difference about 0.98∘C0.98\,^{\circ}\mathrm{C}).

Series t × Tmax × teq × Q(t)

In the first two files, Tmax_C is the FEM value at point 0,0.5, teq_h uses Ea/R=4000KE_a/R=4000\,\mathrm{K} and Q_kJ_kg is the two-term isothermal generation.

In the particular file, Tmax_C is the analytical centre temperature, teq_h =t=t and Q_kJ_kg comes from the particular Hill law (a=12.35ha=12.35\,\mathrm{h}, c=1.678c=1.678, ΔT=30∘C\Delta T=30\,^{\circ}\mathrm{C}).

Spatial histories from the report, for checks at other depths: IsoTeq, FormAdi, Qparticular and analytical centre and x=0.25mx=0.25\,\mathrm{m}.

Report figures

Canonical heat-generation curves Slab layout Particular curve Analytical and FEM histories Profile at x = 0.25 m Profile at mid-depth Maps at Tmax Sections at three instants Mid-rise section Section at Tmax Cooling section